<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article Marketing is About as Dead as a Hundred Dollar Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:47:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Ramirez</title>
		<link>http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Ramirez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexisdawes.com/?p=207#comment-16313</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness! Although I&#039;ve stayed quite busy with my $15 to $30 prices, there are still a lot of people who wonder why I don&#039;t write for $5. Quality writing is always going to be more valuable...and I&#039;m glad that Ezine articles is starting to see that. I agree with Hunter...what I&#039;ve seen there has been downright pitiful. 

Can&#039;t wait to see more of this series! And huzzah for quality writing coming back to the forefront!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness! Although I&#8217;ve stayed quite busy with my $15 to $30 prices, there are still a lot of people who wonder why I don&#8217;t write for $5. Quality writing is always going to be more valuable&#8230;and I&#8217;m glad that Ezine articles is starting to see that. I agree with Hunter&#8230;what I&#8217;ve seen there has been downright pitiful. </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see more of this series! And huzzah for quality writing coming back to the forefront!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-16310</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexisdawes.com/?p=207#comment-16310</guid>
		<description>I recently started writing articles for EzineArticles. I thought it was funny how much they emphasize quality content and an extensive review process, while a quick look through their archives turned up more spam than you can shake a stick at.

I think 400 words is a perfectly fair minimum. It&#039;s possible to communicate something of value in fewer words, but it just doesn&#039;t happen often. Setting the bar at 400 will hopefully scare away the people who can&#039;t be bothered to put in a modicum of effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently started writing articles for EzineArticles. I thought it was funny how much they emphasize quality content and an extensive review process, while a quick look through their archives turned up more spam than you can shake a stick at.</p>
<p>I think 400 words is a perfectly fair minimum. It&#8217;s possible to communicate something of value in fewer words, but it just doesn&#8217;t happen often. Setting the bar at 400 will hopefully scare away the people who can&#8217;t be bothered to put in a modicum of effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-16309</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexisdawes.com/?p=207#comment-16309</guid>
		<description>I knew you were busy. Busy is good though. Can&#039;t wait to hear the maniacal laughing.

You make such excellent points in regards to the editing that goes on with an el cheapo article. 

A lot of IM&#039;ers have this fantasy that they can get everything for cut rate prices, or put forth BS work, and make a million dollars overnight. (yawn!)

As with any other form of online marketing, if you do things right the first time, you don&#039;t have to worry about doing it 100 times. 

Writing a few really good articles is better than distributing 200 articles that really don&#039;t say anything. The Google rank for the good articles alone makes the extra effort worth it. I&#039;ve got 6-7 year old articles that still deliver traffic. Quality pieces, not articles that could lose street credibility with the next Google update. 

So maybe I&#039;m old fashioned in that way, but so be it. 

Alexis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew you were busy. Busy is good though. Can&#8217;t wait to hear the maniacal laughing.</p>
<p>You make such excellent points in regards to the editing that goes on with an el cheapo article. </p>
<p>A lot of IM&#8217;ers have this fantasy that they can get everything for cut rate prices, or put forth BS work, and make a million dollars overnight. (yawn!)</p>
<p>As with any other form of online marketing, if you do things right the first time, you don&#8217;t have to worry about doing it 100 times. </p>
<p>Writing a few really good articles is better than distributing 200 articles that really don&#8217;t say anything. The Google rank for the good articles alone makes the extra effort worth it. I&#8217;ve got 6-7 year old articles that still deliver traffic. Quality pieces, not articles that could lose street credibility with the next Google update. </p>
<p>So maybe I&#8217;m old fashioned in that way, but so be it. </p>
<p>Alexis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabella "Niche Lady" Murphy</title>
		<link>http://alexisdawes.com/207/article-marketing-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabella "Niche Lady" Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexisdawes.com/?p=207#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear you&#039;ve been sick. I&#039;m in the middle of a few projects and I&#039;m absolutely *drowning* in the production process. It&#039;s all good - another week of pushin&#039; it and I should be laughing maniacally soon :) 

Woo - I got mentioned! On the great Queen DBO&#039;s blog? *fans self* OK, ego moment over. 

Moving on - yes, I really think that people are waking up to the fact that $5 for 500 word articles are not cutting it anymore. I&#039;ve explained to my little circle that these articles are usually more expensive in the long run. When&#039;s the last time you&#039;ve purchased a $5 article that didn&#039;t require massive editing? That didn&#039;t have to be rewritten? That passes Copyscape? 

The articles that people find the most intriguing are the ones that have great lead-ins, that flow beautifully, and feel more cohesive and put together than a crochet blanket. 

Can you buy a $5 quilt? Sure you could - but I highly doubt it would be of fantastic quality. The work that goes into one of those masterpieces is similar to what goes into a good article. Open up a magazine sometime - that&#039;s where we&#039;re going online. I already see it, and I highly doubt someone&#039;s going to realistically write a piece of that length, style, and depth for $0.01/word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear you&#8217;ve been sick. I&#8217;m in the middle of a few projects and I&#8217;m absolutely *drowning* in the production process. It&#8217;s all good &#8211; another week of pushin&#8217; it and I should be laughing maniacally soon <img src='http://alexisdawes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Woo &#8211; I got mentioned! On the great Queen DBO&#8217;s blog? *fans self* OK, ego moment over. </p>
<p>Moving on &#8211; yes, I really think that people are waking up to the fact that $5 for 500 word articles are not cutting it anymore. I&#8217;ve explained to my little circle that these articles are usually more expensive in the long run. When&#8217;s the last time you&#8217;ve purchased a $5 article that didn&#8217;t require massive editing? That didn&#8217;t have to be rewritten? That passes Copyscape? </p>
<p>The articles that people find the most intriguing are the ones that have great lead-ins, that flow beautifully, and feel more cohesive and put together than a crochet blanket. </p>
<p>Can you buy a $5 quilt? Sure you could &#8211; but I highly doubt it would be of fantastic quality. The work that goes into one of those masterpieces is similar to what goes into a good article. Open up a magazine sometime &#8211; that&#8217;s where we&#8217;re going online. I already see it, and I highly doubt someone&#8217;s going to realistically write a piece of that length, style, and depth for $0.01/word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

